Court of Cassation and Justice Analyzing the

Roselin67

Aopinion it was argued that art. para. of the Code of Civil Procedure is also applicable if the party names the right of appeal incorrectly although it was correctly indicated by the court. G. Boroi M. Stancu Civil procedural law third edition revised and added Hamangiu Publishing House p. . ARE YOU COMING. The opinion of the Board of Directors of the Braov Court of Appeal The Board of Management of the Braov Court of Appeal did not present a point of view on the legal issue that forms the object of the appeal in the interest of the law.

VIII. The opinion of the general prosecutor of the Prosecutors Office attached to the High Country Email List different jurisprudential guidelines revealed by the Board of Appeal of the Court of Appeal Braov through the notification of appeal in the interest of the law the general prosecutor appreciated as being in the letter and spirit of the law the opinion according to which the right of appeal was wrongly declared although correctly mentioned in the operative part of the court decision attacked is inadmissible without the possibility of further declaring any appeal. He also noted that the provisions of art. para. of the Code of.



Civil Procedure have a wider scope than that of the provisions of art. para. of the same code so that this norm will also be applied in the event that the party due to ignorance or lack of preparation incorrectly names the form of appeal although in the contested judgment the appeal provided by law in which case according to art. of the Code of Civil Procedure finding that the request for the exercise of the right of appeal is validly made and the reasons clearly show the purpose pursued by the party the court of judicial control will order the.